point one today: this
article is absolutely preposterous. it's an algorithm! home buyers discriminate against
black and latino neighbourhoods. not zillow.com. absurd.
phew. now that i've got that off my chest, happy halloween, everyone! look at my masterful
use of html. if you say you're not impressed, i don't believe you.
instead of trick-or-treating, tonight i'll be gorging myself on all you can eat sushi.
that's the way i like my halloweens. it's awfully windy today. unlike yesterday,
when i reminisced about autumn in DC, today on my walk to work i reminisced about
columbus day my sophomore year of college, when i was feeling mighty homesick so i
flew home to spokane to surprise la mia famiglia. and i went to see amanda run cross
country. september and october in spokane are so nice. so crisp and autumnal.
walking today, i got a whiff of a wood fire (i think they're banned in london, so
someone's in trouble) but that, too, reminded me of spokae in the fall. now if
only there were a high school football game i could go to.
hmm. i wonder if they show college football on sky in this country.
ok. so i'm rambling. and i should get back to work. catch you on the flip side.
what makes leaves turn pretty colors in the fall? i don't mean what activates the
process, but what affects the specific colors. is it the soil? the air? the annual
or daily cycle of temperature change? i only ask because i was walking to work
today (yes, it's still the prettiest walk to work ever), and i noticed that the
leaves are falling from trees in st james's park. but they're not going the gorgeous
oranges and reds and browns that i demand from my foliage ca. halloween time. you
know, like the trees upriver from georgetown go. they always made walking
across the potomac on the key bridge such a joy in october and november.
oooho. reminiscence. and bonus reminiscence: 7 years ago tomorrow, my parents came
to visit me at gtown for the first time. and of course they wore stupid nose/mustache
glasses...because it was halloweeen. i miss DC. but i still think joe should
move to seattle.
i won the party friday night. then saturday i went to every furniture store
in central london in search of a table. found one i loved, only to learn
yesterday that there's a 10 week wait for delivery. so i bought a different
table from the same shop, which will be delivered in 12 days. i also
bought a kettle and some wine glasses from M&S yesterday. and hangers from
selfridges. and then ran into jack and pete on bond street.
sunday, i went to mass with matt (hurrah!) and then for delicious four seasons
chinese with andrew, and then bought the table, and then continued the boring
but necessary work of reading my doctoral thesis in anticipation of my defense,
which is approaching rapidly. sigh.
As a student at Regis University I was disgusted that it was required of our Liturgist to spread your message of hate, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness. I am very happy to be able to say that I am not a member of one of the dioceses to which this letter was sent, but instead a member of the Spokane Diocese.
While I understand that you, as the shepherd of your people, are there to lead the Catholics of your diocese I do not understand your requiring parishes to spread a message of hate. You are the leader of these people, and you have failed to lead them. With your letter, you have pushed your people, not lead them.
Growing up in a very Catholic family, attending a Catholic grade school, high school, and university I am disgusted. My teachers have always taught me to question. In science, math, religion, history I was taught to question, for when you question, you find the greater truth. Your letter did not ask us to question, but instead to follow blindly.
In my first class of high school my Latin teacher wrote AMDG on the board. He explained that it was latin, and the guiding principle of our school. For the greater glory of God, he explained, we ought to live. Not by what we are told, not by what our friends or family do, not by what our gut says to do, but we should act for the glorification of God.
How ought we to live? A question posed by the mission statement of Regis. Your letter doesn't make a real attempt to ask us this question. In fact your message does not once ask us a question. You are telling us what to do for all but the last paragraph where you instruct the readers to pray.
As the student chapel manager, work study employee for Regis University Ministry, and Peer Minister in the residence halls, I am also disgusted. I was taught that we, as University Ministry, were to accept all just as Jesus did. Jesus ate and drank with lepers, prostitutes and tax collectors, and showed them the error of their ways, but never forced them to change. Jesus taught us to love all.
Attending Jesuit institutions for the last five years, and having a Jesuit uncle, I have always been a fan of St. Ignatius Loyola. I was recently praying late one night to the Loyola statue on campus. As I was about to leave I read one of the plagues at the foot of the statue. The quote of Loyola's read, "For everything has the potential of calling forth in us a deeper response to our life in God. Our only desire and our one choice should be this: I want and I choose what better leads to God's deepening his life in me."
How can we expect Catholics to continue to pray and believe and share the love of our God with others when they leave mass early because they are disgusted with what is being said? At both of today's masses many people left the building after the first few sentences of your letter. They knew that the message to follow was going to be filled with hate not acceptance.
The Catholic Catechism even says, "They [homosexually inclined people] must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition (2358)." It does not say that they are evil people, and cannot have love, but that they have a unique hindrance in their path to God.
We all have our own blockages, hindrances, and obstacles in our path to God. For me, one of those hindrances is my disdain for most people. For others it is not loving all of God's creations. For even others, telling their followers what to do instead of leading them to make their own conclusions is their mistake. For others it is promoting discrimination through opposing SB 081 here in Colorado. For as it was once said, "The worth of a life is not determined by a single failure or a solitary success." We all have obstacles in our spiritual life, but we are still travelers on the road to God.
In my interview to be a Peer Minister I was asked how I, a Catholic, would reach out to others. I sat for a second and then said "Love." The questioning faces of my interviews asked for more to my answer so I continued to explain that the underlying message of all religions is love. Love for other, love for God, and God's love for us.
Hate, bigotry, and close-mindedness was what your letter taught me about the Catholic Church. Your letter did not teach me to love. Your letter did not teach me to accept. Your letter did not teach me to keep an open mind. Your letter did not teach me the good that I can do. Jesus has taught me to love, accept, keep an open mind, and that I can change the world for the better. So I will end with a question. How can you sleep at night knowing that you showed your people the way to hate and not to love, to bigotry, not acceptance, to close-mindedness, not to open-mindedness?
In Christ's love for all his people,
-Robert C. House